The changing nature of the modern war and the modern soldier

Since the Cold War, we have witnessed a huge shift through the war. At the end of the Second World War, very few equally balanced modern powers came into direct conflict. The Cold War itself was characterized by a series of proxy battles in which the two great powers supported one or more warriors in the world. The most famous example of these conflicts is the Vietnam War.

Since the Cold War, the proxy wars, civil wars, and inter-ethnic ethnic conflicts that characterize modern warfare have been characterized in a very different way. Two completely "modernized" countries have not fought each other for decades. The main reason for this is that the Western countries are closely linked to the global trade of wars for being necessary or profitable. Since then, western countries have approached conflicts indirectly and have introduced many intervention and peacekeeping missions in many countries around the world. By leaving the "War of Terror", the majority of wars over the past two decades were civil war or ethnic conflict where the war fights ethnic, religious and racial grounds. These wars typically contain handheld weapons like conventional modern weapons. These wars have led to a new era of peacekeeping missions in the Western States to intervene to protect humanitarian interests.

This also led to a radical shift in the nature of the modern soldier in two excellent military categories. The first is the one with whom we are most familiar with the highly trained soldier with highly qualified weapons and equipment. These soldiers characterize the armies of Western countries developing in parallel with the end of World War II and the end of the Cold War. "Modern" military connections are in the stock with state of the art technology, which amounts to up to 5,000 pounds / soldier – complemented by military stock insurance. These soldiers are primarily involved in peace-building missions and intervention wars, with the primary role of direct fighting instead of keeping the order.

The second type of soldier, however, is much more common in the war. The second type of soldier, who has appeared since the end of the Cold War (and in a sense even before), is a guerilla warrior. This umbrella term came to the conclusion that a large number of soldiers are organized from child soldiers, militia groups, ethnic groups to terrorist cells. These soldiers represent a very different class of warriors and are characterized by the lack of military training and the weighing of very low-grade equipment. The most commonly used weapon is the AK-47 – a cheap multifaceted weapon that an 8 year old child can have a devastating effect. These weapons have flooded the international market since the collapse of the Soviet Union, and since the end of the Cold War, they have been found in all major conflicts. These soldiers might not meet the usual definition of the military, but the most common warrior of military conflicts.

The most important problem of modernized armed forces is that it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish warriors from non-combatants. The lack of uniformity and phenomena has created potential enemies for all members of the population, as I saw in Iraq and Afghanistan. The nature of this war is problematic for war behavior and presents the current problems with which the world is living.

Source by sbobet th

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *